CasinoStop10 | Strategies | Poker: Passive and Aggressive – Which Is Better Exposed Here!

Poker: Passive and Aggressive – Which Is Better Exposed Here!

Often people wonder whether its better to play poker passive or aggressive. In this short article I am going to explain to you which is better and why. Read on now.

There are two types of people in poker: passive players and aggressive players. We know there are differences, we know that these players play the game in a different way but which one is actually better?

No matter who you are, whether you just started playing Texas Holdem Poker, have been playing for a while or a quite the seasoned punter, don’t you want to know whether its better to play poker passive or aggressive?

Whoever you are, I know that you, like me, want to know which is the better type of player so you can change yourself to play like that. Then you can win more money.

The issue is, sometimes players don’t know what way to play or what to do because they are given so much information. If you’re struggling to consistently win money at poker it likely isn’t you fault. It probably has nothing to do with you. So let us take aim the issue here. In fact, we are going to nail it down right now.

How Poker Is A Game Of Skill

Poker is a game of skill. It involves luck, but the game is not purely based on luck. This is what makes it so interesting. Poker is not a pure gamble like a slot machine or roulette table. You can actually change how the game unfolds with your specific actions. This is the beauty of poker (and some think its the beast as well).

The bottom line is, the single greatest impact a player has on affecting the outcome of the game is by betting! Betting chips, calling, raising or reraising. This is the biggest factor you as an individual have to change the outcome of the game, preferably into your favour.

Why That Is Important In This Distinction

That point is extremely important because if gives us a valuable piece of prior knowledge when we look at the best way to play poker: passive or aggressive. You see, a passive player will often bet timidly, preffering to check or call another player then actually making the first move himself. An aggressive player on the other hand loves to bet, they love to make the first move and in fact, they don’t really want to check or call.

This is important because it raises the question ‘How much affect is each player causing in the game?’. A passive player will not have as much strength to change the tides of the game because they aren’t utilising to the fullest the one method that is available to them. Aggressive players on the other hand are trying as much as is possible to affect the game, to change how its unfolding, to cut it short or beef up the pot. Looking at this one point its easy to see which one has the potential to be better.

And The Winner Is…

If I had to make a decision I would say that aggressive is a better way to play then passive. In reality though, its not as black and white as this. Sometimes passive play can be helpful, like if you want to check-raise, in some types of bluff, if you want to easily see the next card cause your punting for a draw etc. There are many situations when both are the best, but overall, if I had to say for an overall strategy or tactics to win at poker, aggressive is definitely the way to go.

We use cookies on this website to improve the experience of our visitors. If you continue to use this site we'll assume that you are fine with it
Agree & Close